hi, jujubeesk ~
The first therapist I saw for debilitating anxiety and panic attacks preferred an approach of 'talk' therapy (he also happened to be a pastor, used a sliding scale for fees, and was very good and helpful). When I discovered a blind medication-based NIMH study for folks with Anxiety Disorder, I asked him for a required referral to apply for admittance. He didn't believe that this was the right avenue for me, but upon my insistence, wrote the note.
I think we have to have a productive balance with our Ts and pDocs for our treatment to work... Yeah, we have to relinquish a bunch of control, allow trust to develop, and work things the way we're guided by them, but I think it's not a bad idea to also remember that they are providing a service, and... we as patients are the consumers.
As Nik pointed out, Bipolar and BPD often are co-morbid. I'm thinking meds and treatment for one won't conflict with the other.
jujubeesk wrote:
She does not beleive in the BPD Dx... she has that typical opinion that it is a wastbasket DX. I do not agree because there is much more to BPD then other psych DXs. I think I may have bipoler but I still beleive that I have BPD...
I feel it's ok if you acknowledge this T's philosophy about BPD and purposefully engage in treatment for Bipolar, and at the same time ask that she respect your belief that you may also suffer from BPD. Like Nik said, it certainly won't hurt to work the tools practiced here!
~ jr
Oh, I wanted to throw in my fourteen cents on this, too -
Quote:
labels are good for insurance and not much else. its more learning what you do and how you act and why and how to change the behavior. bipolar is much more chemical, as bpd is more behavioral based.
I agree totally that clinical labels have limitations (and sometimes impose limitations as well).
According to what I've learned, though, it's not fer sure that BPD doesn't have physiological factors.